Federal Road Safety Commission Boss |
A
Federal High Court in Lagos Wednesday 26, 2014 held that it was
unconstitutional for the Federal Road Safety Commission, FRSC, to impose new
number plates on motorists in the country.
The
judge, Justice James Tsoho, delivered the judgment following a suit by a
lawyer, Emmanuel Ofoegbu, challenging the powers of FRSC to issue the new
number plates.
Ofoegbu
had challenged the power of the commission to impound vehicles of motorists who
failed to acquire the new numbers.
Tsho
held that it was unlawful for the respondent to impose the new number plates on
motorists, where there was no existing law permitting same.
He
said: “The issue of redesigning new number plates by the respondent is not
covered under the provisions of any law in Nigeria.
“The
respondent cannot force Nigerians to acquire new number plates by impounding
cars, without the backing of any legislation to that effect.
“I
hold that the act of the respondent amounts to an arbitrary use of power, and
is therefore illegal and unconstitutional.
“Judgment
is, therefore, entered in favour of the plaintiff, and all the reliefs sought
are hereby granted, I so hold.”
The
plaintiff had filed the suit on September 30, 2013 through a Human Rights
Activists, Mr Ogedi Ogu.
The
plaintiff had sought a declaration that the threat by the respondents to
impound vehicles of motorists, who failed to acquire the new number plates was
invalid and unconstitutional.
In
his statement of facts, the plaintiff averred that the old plate numbers were
issued under the provisions of the National Road Traffic Regulations, NRTR,
2004.
He
averred that the NRTR 2004, is a subsidiary legislation made under the FRSC
Act, Laws of the Federation as revised in 2004.
Ofoegbu
averred that there was no law made in accordance with the 1999 Constitution of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), which prohibits the use of the
old plate numbers, or declares its use as an offence.
He
also averred that the threat by the respondent to impound vehicles and arrest
motorists who failed to comply with the October 1 deadline, was a gross
violation of the provisions of 36 (12) of the constitution which
guarantees the rights of individuals.
He
had, therefore, urged the court to declare as unlawful, the threat by the
respondent, to arrest motorists using the old number plates because there is no
law validly made in accordance with the constitution prohibiting its user.
The applicant had also sought an order of
injunction restraining the defendants from impounding vehicles or otherwise
arresting or harassing motorists who failed to acquire the new number plate.
No comments:
Post a Comment